On 08/22/2012 11:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@windriver.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + if (kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> return !!kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip));
> }
>
> If the caller only cares about zero vs. non-zero, you can drop the !!.
Yes, so 'return kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip);' is already fine and simple.
I'll update this as v2 so thanks your comment.
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
