Directly comparing current->personality against PER_LINUX32 doesn't work
in cases when any of the personality flags stored in the top three bytes
are used.

Directly forcefully setting personality to PER_LINUX32 or PER_LINUX
discards any flags stored in the top three bytes

Use personality() macro to compare only PER_MASK bytes and make sure that
we are setting only the bits that should be set, instead of
overwriting the whole value.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkos...@suse.cz>
---

changed since v1: fix the bit ops to reflect the fact that PER_LINUX is 
actually 0

 arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
index f2496f2..dc1558e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
@@ -107,11 +107,11 @@ long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality)
        long ret;
 
        if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32
-           && personality == PER_LINUX)
-               personality = PER_LINUX32;
+           && personality(personality) == PER_LINUX)
+               personality |= PER_LINUX32;
        ret = sys_personality(personality);
-       if (ret == PER_LINUX32)
-               ret = PER_LINUX;
+       if (personality(ret) == PER_LINUX32)
+               ret &= ~PER_LINUX32;
        return ret;
 }
 #endif
-- 
1.7.3.1

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to