On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > To clarify the meaning for future readers, replace the open coded > 19 with CONTEXT_BITS > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_hash64.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_hash64.c > b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_hash64.c > index 40677aa..daa076c 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_hash64.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_hash64.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(mmu_context_ida); > * Each segment contains 2^28 bytes. Each context maps 2^44 bytes, > * so we can support 2^19-1 contexts (19 == 35 + 28 - 44). > */ > -#define MAX_CONTEXT ((1UL << 19) - 1) > +#define MAX_CONTEXT ((1UL << CONTEXT_BITS) - 1)
This is a good thing to do, but you should also update the comment. Maybe you should put this patch before your number 10/13 and then change the comment in the same patch where you add the 64TB support. Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
