On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 16:45 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Some parts are due to corenet versus non-corenet, such as the actual > register you write to to disable/enable the timebase. > > There's also a two-core assumption in the synchronization code which > I've complained about multiple times -- although on closer inspection it > looks like this is done under cpu_add_remove_lock, and we can assume > that there's only one core at a time in take_timebase(), regardless of > how many cores are in the system.
Right, it should work fine with any number of cores or am I missing something ? (btw, since when complaining about something helps ? :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
