On 06/26/2012 09:27 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
Grab the devicetree node properties to override VendorId, ProductId,
bcdDevice, Manucacturer, Product and SerialNumber
Like before, the code looks good to me:
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com>
Not commenting on the other aspects of the business logic though.
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:43:03 +0200, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm still confused about what is the order of priority for the 2
possible sources of these values. The way it is written, the DT value is
a default, not an override.
They are overwritten by module parameter but they are overwriting anything that
composite gadget might be providing.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
