On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 08:53 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > The macro system we use cannot do that (it will prefix with REG_), > since > > both arguments are registers we must use R0 in this case. > > So define a ___PPC_RA0 macro that doesn't do that.
But then we lose the checking for other instructions :-) Unless we start being nasty and defining a different macro form for RA which can be 0... I'd rather not go there unless we absolutely have to... What would be nice also would be if we had a gas option to enforce the use of % for register names. We'd probably have to struggle a little bit with gcc inline asm in a case or two though. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
