On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:31 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (0001-ftrace-ppc-Have-PPC-skip-updating-with-stop_machine.patch)
> From: Steven Rostedt <srost...@redhat.com>
> 
> PPC does not have the synchronization issues that x86 has with
> modifying code on one CPU while another CPU is executing it.
> The other CPU will either see the old or new code without any
> issues, unlike x86 which may issue a GPF.
> 
> Instead of calling the heavy stop_machine, just update the code.

This looks nice, but it's giving me this:

arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c:497:13: error: static declaration of 
'ftrace_replace_code' follows non-static declaration                            
                    
include/linux/ftrace.h:317:13: note: previous declaration of 
'ftrace_replace_code' was here

I think the fix is just to make our ftrace_replace_code() non-static?

cheers


> +static void ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
> +{
> +     struct ftrace_rec_iter *iter;
> +     struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     for (iter = ftrace_rec_iter_start(); iter;
> +          iter = ftrace_rec_iter_next(iter)) {
> +             rec = ftrace_rec_iter_record(iter);
> +             ret = __ftrace_replace_code(rec, enable);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     ftrace_bug(ret, rec->ip);
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     }
> +}
> +


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to