On 05/11/2012 06:53 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
\> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE) || defined(CONFIG_6xx)
> +extern void __flush_disable_L1(void);
> +#endif
Prototypes aren't normally guarded by ifdefs.
> +static void __cpuinit smp_85xx_mach_cpu_die(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
> + idle_task_exit();
> + generic_set_cpu_dead(cpu);
> + mb();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_TCR, 0);
> +
> + __flush_disable_L1();
> + tmp = (mfspr(SPRN_HID0) & ~(HID0_DOZE|HID0_SLEEP)) | HID0_NAP;
> + mtspr(SPRN_HID0, tmp);
> +
> + /* Enter NAP mode. */
> + tmp = mfmsr();
> + tmp |= MSR_WE;
> + mb();
> + mtmsr(tmp);
> + isync();
Need isync after writing to HID0.
> + /*
> + * We don't set the BPTR register here upon it points
> + * to the boot page properly.
> + */
> + mpic_reset_core(hw_cpu);
That comment's wording is hard to follow -- maybe s/upon it points/since
it already points/
> + /* wait until core is ready... */
> + if (!spin_event_timeout(in_be32(&spin_table->addr_l) == 1,
> + 10000, 100)) {
> + pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for core %d to reset\n",
> + __func__, hw_cpu);
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto out;
> + }
We need to fix U-Boot to write addr_l last (with an msync beforehand).
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) || defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
Let's not grow lists like this. Is there any harm in building it
unconditionally?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
