On 06/01/2012 04:14 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:26 -0400, Bob Cochran wrote: >> I believe that additional patches are required for CodeWarrior to >> work >> properly (e.g., assembly start up). I think the patches should come >> from Freescale. For whatever reason, they include them in their SDK, >> but haven't submitted them for inclusion in the mainline. >> >> As a developer on Freescale Power products, I would like to see >> Freescale offer up a CodeWarrior patch set, so I don't have to manage >> the patches myself when working outside the SDK (i.e., on a more >> recent >> kernel). > > Such patches would have a hard time getting upstream considering that > codewarrior is a commercial product.
It's not really about CodeWarrior -- it's needed for any external debug on these chips. Those chips are commercial products too, BTW. :-) -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
