Hi Neil,

 thanks for you help.

> > 
> > What about the fix for mv_udc, shouldn't they have a similar
> > "limitation"? How do you explain?
> > Or maybe someone from Marvell has an answer?
> > 
> 
> Yes, we encountered the same issue, and I have answered your question several 
> hours ago.
> Please have a look.

Thanks for that.
Relating to the other *udc.c driver, do you think they should implement
a similar workaround there too or at least check their errataS?

Thanks,
 -- Christoph
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to