On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:13 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > > What if you just comment out the tickle code ? > > I haven't tried it yet, but I suspect it won't tickle the fcu any more > since wf_control_set avoids writing an unchanged value (unlike the old > driver).
Sure, the question is whether that fixes the "annoyance" :-) I don't think we really need to tickle the FCU as long as we have that #define set in windfarm_fcu to use the actual fan values rather than the programmed one. In fact, can you change that define around and see if it makes it behave more like therm_pm72 overall ? IE That's the only -known- difference between the old and new driver (+/- a bug / typo / etc..) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
