On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 19:09 +0000, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > > I think that is more due to how you added the MPIC error interrupts > and > > issues w/that code. If you are treating the MPIC error interrupts > as a > > cascade than they should have a distinct linux IRQ space from the > > standard MPIC interrupts. This is how the MSIs work (as an > example). > In case of error interrupts we are depending on the mpic_host_maps > for mapping and interrupt specifier translations. There is no separate > initialization as in case of MSIs. That's the reason I am treating > error interrupts as mpic internal interrupt sources.
It makes sense to have an allocator for MPIC vectors but it should be a single allocator shared with the MSI code. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
