On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:52 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > If we want to fix it a better way, then sure, that'll be good. But > what > we shouldn't do is re-introduce one regression to fix a different > regression. > > So, Thomas, what do you think about providing a way that a disabled > interrupt could have its pending status cleared such that when it's > enabled, any queued events are ignored? Maybe an > enable_and_clear_irq() ?
Ok. Doesn't matter anyway, this shouldn't be the problem in this specific case. IE. we shouldn't be setting that interrupt to NONE. We should have parsed the device-tree and set the trigger appropriately. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
