On 03/29/2012 03:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
- include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h
#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE 0xffa00000
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS 0xfffa00000ull
#else
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
#endif
#else
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE 0xfff00000
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS 0xffff00000ull
#else
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
#endif
#endif
- include/configs/p1_p2_rdb_pc.h
#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_FSL_ELBC
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE 0xff800000
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS 0xfff800000ull
#else
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
#endif
There are two (well 3 since rdb-pc has both 32b& 36b) in the tree now:
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc_32b.dts
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc_36b.dts
Okay. So I assume that one has the proper NAND address and my patch
should be reverted then. Do want a patch from me for that?
Since both system have the same SoC and the NAND_SPL is always linked
against 0xfff00000 I don't see anything wrong to relocate the NAND CS
later to 0xff800000 (or to 0xffa00000) and having it consistent among
both configs.
what about this thing? Should leave it as it or move to the same
location? Since I have no HW *I* would prefer not to touch it :)
- k
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
