On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:01:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/of.h between commit eb740b5f3e65 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce
> EEH device") from the powerpc tree and commit 0f22dd395fc4 ("of: Only
> compile OF_DYNAMIC on PowerPC pseries and iseries") from the devicetree
> tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc include/linux/of.h
> index bdb1c07,533603e..0000000
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@@ -75,14 -72,10 +75,17 @@@ struct of_phandle_args
> uint32_t args[MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS];
> };
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_EEH)
> +static inline struct eeh_dev *of_node_to_eeh_dev(struct device_node *dn)
> +{
> + return dn->edev;
> +}
> +#endif
Ben, What is this? I don't want the eeh_dev pointer in struct device_node. Up
to
now we've avoided putting any reverse references into device_nodes. For
everything
else we use a reverse lookup, particularly for devices, to avoid growing the
device_node for each new type of lookup.
g.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
