On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:46 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The current implementation of lazy interrupts handling has some > issues that this tries to address. > > Except on iSeries, we don't do the various workarounds we need to > do on re-enable when returning from an interrupt, which can do an > implicit re-enable, and thus we may still lose or get delayed > decrementer or doorbell interrupts.
.../... So we were still losing doorbells on BookE due to a st00pid thinko on my part :-) New patch following, hopefully that one's good ! Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
