On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 14:25 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Okay, thanks for the update, that's equivalent to the get_cpu_var > plus put_cpu_var patch I had generally been running with successfully. > > (I was not at all confident that it was a sufficient fix, and have > to say "generally" above because one time I got something that looked > like recursive calls overflowing the stack, and IIRC something "irq" > did appear in each frame of the trace. But probably no connection, > never seen again, and I don't recall even which -rc or -next it was.)
If you ever see that again, please shoot me the log ! Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
