On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index cce98d7..501f29b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -1732,6 +1732,8 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller
> *hose)
> bus->secondary = hose->first_busno;
> hose->bus = bus;
>
> + pci_bus_insert_busn_res(bus, hose->first_busno, hose->last_busno);
> +
> /* Get probe mode and perform scan */
> mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
> if (node && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode)
> @@ -1742,8 +1744,11 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller
> *hose)
> of_scan_bus(node, bus);
> }
>
> - if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL)
> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL) {
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, 255);
> hose->last_busno = bus->subordinate = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, bus->subordinate);
> + }
The only architecture-specific thing here is discovering the range of
bus numbers below a host bridge. The architecture should not have to
mess around with pci_bus_update_busn_res_end() like this. It should
be able to say "here's my bus number range" (and of course the PCI
core can default to 0-255 if the arch doesn't supply a range) and the
core should take care of the rest.
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
