On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:09 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > On 12/03/2011 10:31 PM, shuo....@freescale.com wrote: > > From: Liu Shuo <shuo....@freescale.com> > > > > Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer RAM. In order > > to support the Nand flash chip whose page size is larger than 2K bytes, > > we read/write 2k data repeatedly by issuing FIR_OP_RB/FIR_OP_WB and save > > them to a large buffer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <shuo....@freescale.com> > > --- > > v3: > > -remove page_size of struct fsl_elbc_mtd. > > -do a oob write by NAND_CMD_RNDIN. > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 243 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > What is the plan for bad block marker migration?
Why it should be migrated? I thought that you support 2KiB pages, and this adds 4 and 8 KiB pages support, which you never supported before. What is the migration you guys are talking about? Artem. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
