On 12/01/2011 03:46 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > >> How is this going to interact with other i2c buses (e.g. on a board >> FPGA) that might have a conflicting static numbering scheme? Have you >> ensured that no dynamic bus registrations (e.g. an i2c bus on a PCI >> device) can happen before the static SoC i2c buses are added? > > Hmm.... You have a point there. > >>> An alternative approach is to create a function like this: >>> >>> struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adapter_from_node(struct device_node *np); >>> >>> I could then just use adap->nr directly. >> >> If there isn't a way to get a "struct device" from "struct device_node", >> we should add it. > > How do I do that? Scan all the struct devices until I find one where > dev->of_node == np? That seems really inefficient.
Ideally we would have a field in struct device_node that points to struct device. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
