On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbarysh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c
>> index 00d93a4..cacb4d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c
>> @@ -330,10 +330,6 @@ static void __init p1022_ds_setup_arch(void)
>> }
>>
>> static struct of_device_id __initdata p1022_ds_ids[] = {
>> - { .type = "soc", },
>> - { .compatible = "soc", },
>> - { .compatible = "simple-bus", },
>> - { .compatible = "gianfar", },
>> /* So that the DMA channel nodes can be probed individually: */
>> { .compatible = "fsl,eloplus-dma", },
>> {},
>> @@ -343,6 +339,7 @@ static int __init p1022_ds_publish_devices(void)
>> {
>> return of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, p1022_ds_ids, NULL);
>> }
>> +machine_device_initcall(p1022_ds, mpc85xx_common_publish_devices);
>> machine_device_initcall(p1022_ds, p1022_ds_publish_devices);
>
> I don't think this is working. I need to investigate some more to be
> sure, but it looks like this is not picking up "fsl,eloplus-dma".
> None of the DMA channels are being probed in the audio driver
> (sound/soc/fsl_dma.c).
Hmm, that's odd. Should see if the issues exists before the change.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
