On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 12:15 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:16:40AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:41 +0530, Tanmay Inamdar wrote: > > > Fixing interrupt mapping of EMAC for canyonlands > > > > The previous stuff was odd .... but was it broken ? > > > > It was done this way because the EMAC actually has more interrupts than > > that which are routed to different UICs, and so doing a local map this > > way allows to target multiple parents. > > Well, in the canyonlands case, it appears that the interrupts went to > the same pic, so the simpler representation should be correct as > well. However, there certainly are boards where they go to multiple > pics, so we need this interrupt-map trick.
Doesn't emac has something like 4 more interrupts that we simply haven't been bothered wiring up (because we don't use them ?) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
