On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 10:08 +0800, LiuShuo wrote: > Ok and I want to add another patch before 3/3. > > -LiuShuo > > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:29 +0800, b35...@freescale.com wrote: > >> From: Liu Shuo<b35...@freescale.com> > >> > >> If we use the Nand flash chip whose number of pages in a block is greater > >> than 64(for large page), we must treat the low bit of FBAR as being the > >> high bit of the page address due to the limitation of FCM, it simply uses > >> the low 6-bits (for large page) of the combined block/page address as the > >> FPAR component, rather than considering the actual block size. > > Looks like this patch depends on the previous white-space clean-up patch > > - could you please refactor it (and 3/3 too) and resend? > Ok and I am going to add another new patch before 3/3.
Sure, send 3/3 as well because this one depends on the cleanup patch, so cannot be applied independently. Artem. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
