On Nov 17, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > If we include the p1020rdb.dts instead of p1020si.dts we greatly reduce > duplication and maintenance. We can just list which devices are > disabled for the given core and mpic protected sources. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb_camp_core0.dts | 154 +------------------------ > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb_camp_core1.dts | 11 +-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
applied 1-29, and v2 for p2041 & p1022 to 'next' - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
