(Sorry for the repost, I accidentally omitted Baruch's email).
Hello,
I saw Baruch Siach's patch:
powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc
Unfortunately, that patch breaks the dependencies for the P5020DS
platform and does not fix the underlying code which does not
understand what the ambiguous "CONFIG_E500" means.
In order to fix the issue at the fundamental level, I created the
following 17-patch series loosely based on Baruch's patch.
=== High-Level Summary ===
The e500v1/v2 and e500mc/e5500 CPU families are not compatible with
each other, yet they share the same "CONFIG_E500" Kconfig option.
The following patch series splits the 32-bit CPU support into two
separate options: "CONFIG_FSL_E500_V1_V2" and "CONFIG_FSL_E500MC".
Additionally, the 64-bit e5500 support is separated to its own config
option ("CONFIG_FSL_E5500") which is automatically combined with
either 32-bit e500MC or 64-bit Book-3E when the P5020DS board support
is enabled.
I based the patches on v3.2-rc1, please let me know if I should
update the patches against a different tree.
The first 4 patches stand on their own merits; they are generic code
cleanups necessary to support the later patches.
I'd like to know what you all think.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Curious about my work on the Debian powerpcspe port?
I'm keeping a blog here: http://pureperl.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
