On 11/04/2011 03:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 11/04/2011 07:36 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: >> + "fsl,p1022-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is >> + compatible, and implies lossless Ethernet capability during sleep. >> >> "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is >> compatible; all statements below that apply to "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" also >> apply to "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc". >> >> Compatibility does not include bit assignments in SCCR/PMCDR/DEVDISR; >> these >> - bit assignments are indicated via the sleep specifier in each device's >> - sleep property. >> + bit assignments are indicated via the clock nodes. Device which has a >> + controllable clock source should have a "clk-handle" property pointing >> + to the clock node. > > Do we have any code to use this? > > Normally that shouldn't matter, but we already an unused binding for > this. :-) > > Please provide rationale for doing it this way. Ideally it should > probably use whatever http://devicetree.org/ClockBindings ends up being.
OK, I see the code now. Still could use some explanation. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
