-----Original Message-----
From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+b38951=freescale....@lists.ozlabs.org 
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+b38951=freescale....@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf 
Of Kumar Gala
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:10 PM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: Gala Kumar-B11780; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/fsl-pci: Only scan PCI bus if configured as a 
host


On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:03 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:

> If we're an agent/end-point or fsl_add_bridge doesn't succeed due to 
> some resource failure we should not scan the PCI bus. We change 
> fsl_add_bridge() to return -ENODEV in the case we're an agent/end-point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <b38...@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <le...@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c index 4d4536f..caa7801 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int __init fsl_add_bridge(struct device_node *dev, int 
> is_primary)
>                       iounmap(hose->cfg_data);
>               iounmap(hose->cfg_addr);
>               pcibios_free_controller(hose);
> -             return 0;
> +             return -ENODEV;
>       }
> 
>       setup_pci_cmd(hose);
> @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ void fsl_pci_setup(int primary_phb_addr) {
>       struct device_node *np;
>       struct pci_controller *hose;
> +     int ret;
>       dma_addr_t min_dma_addr = 0xffffffff;
> 
>       for_each_node_by_type(np, "pci") {
> @@ -425,14 +426,16 @@ void fsl_pci_setup(int primary_phb_addr)
>                       struct resource rsrc;
>                       of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc);
>                       if ((rsrc.start & 0xfffff) == primary_phb_addr)
> -                             fsl_add_bridge(np, 1);
> +                             ret = fsl_add_bridge(np, 1);
>                       else
> -                             fsl_add_bridge(np, 0);
> +                             ret = fsl_add_bridge(np, 0);
> 
> -                     hose = pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(np);
> -                     min_dma_addr = min(min_dma_addr,
> -                                     hose->dma_window_base_cur
> -                                     + hose->dma_window_size);
> +                     if (ret == 0) {
> +                             hose = pci_find_hose_for_OF_device(np);
> +                             min_dma_addr = min(min_dma_addr,
> +                                             hose->dma_window_base_cur
> +                                             + hose->dma_window_size);
> +                     }
> 
>               }
>       }

In the failure case (i.e. when ret != 0), what about the following code:

+#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
+       /*
+        * if we couldn't map all of DRAM via the dma windows we need SWIOTLB
+        * to handle buffers located outside of dma capable memory region
+        */
+       if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > min_dma_addr) {
+               ppc_swiotlb_enable = 1;
+               set_pci_dma_ops(&swiotlb_dma_ops);
+               ppc_md.pci_dma_dev_setup = pci_dma_dev_setup_swiotlb;
+       }
+#endif

This should get updated to be:
        if ((ret == 0) && (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > min_dma_arr)) {
[Jia Hongtao-B38951] A board could have more than one pci controllers, so this 
update is not right for it only checked the last one. I will submit another 
patch to solve this issue.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to