On 10/26/2011 02:12 PM, Suzuki Poulose wrote: > On 10/25/11 21:04, Scott Wood wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 09:15 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: >>> This is not the place to enforce that kind of thing. If >>> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is only supported on one platform, then do: >>> >>> config RELOCATABLE >>> depends on 44x >>> >>> and take the 44x reference out of the #ifdef. >> >> ...but please first rename the existing, different CONFIG_RELOCATABLE >> behavior that is currently supported on e500. > > Scott, > > I have renamed the new type of relocation to RELOCATABLE_PPC32_PIE. The > patches > were posted yesterday. Please let me know your thoughts.
I think it would make more sense to rename the existing behavior (maybe something like DYNAMIC_MEMSTART -- if there's even enough overhead to make it worth being configurable at all), since it's not fully relocatable and since 64-bit already uses RELOCATABLE to mean PIE. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
