Kumar Gala wrote: >> > Why did you apply this patch? Both Scott and I rejected it.
> Because its fixing a real issue. If we want to remove PHYS_64BIT support or > make it optional for the board feel free to send another patch. Ok, so if someone posts a patch that works but does things the wrong way, and that patch gets rejected during reviews, but the submitter doesn't post a follow-up patch that does things the right way, you're going to apply the first patch anyway? What about the BSP team's contention that enabling 64-bit support in the kernel can drop performance by up to 25% in some situations? We talked about that on an internal mailing list several months ago. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
