On 09/23/2011 12:54 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Scott Wood wrote: >> How is CONFIG_BOOK3E better than CONFIG_BOOKE? Both e500mc (has RI) and >> e500v2 (doesn't have RI) will select both symbols. Sounds like it >> should be a cputable flag. > > Ben was not in favor of wasting a cpu feature bit on this.
That we're discussing the wastage of a single *bit* suggests the CPU feature mechanism could use an overhaul. :-P -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev