On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote: > On 09/02/2011 01:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote: >>> >>> oh boy, oh boy. This is a huge number of module parameters. Do you >>> actually expect someone setting all of them on modprobe? And if udev is >>> faster you rmmod and modpobe again, right? The clever ones would enter >>> it somewhere in modprobe.conf or so. Anyway. Since you have >>> already device tree bindings and I assume you are using them, why not >>> move all this parameters into the device and remove _all_ module >>> parameters? >> >> In my case, I am passing necessary parameters from platform_data. >> I do not use module param. > > From what I can see in > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/76267 > > is that it is being worked on DT-support for SPEAr. So I think it > would be better to grab this information from the device tree if > available (and keep the standard value otherwise) instead of starting > doing the platform_data thingy.
will get the knowledge about device tree and will explore this option. Regards Pratyush > > Sebastian > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev