Hi, Andrew,
Thank you for applying the patch "[PATCH] rio: Use discovered bit to test if
enumeration is complete "!
So far the following patch "[PATCH] fsl-rio: Correct IECSR register clear value
" has no comment or response.
So could you please apply this patch into your tree?
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Liu Gang
-----Original Message-----
From: Liu Gang-B34182
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 6:14 PM
To: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; Li Yang-R58472; Gala Kumar-B11780; Zang
Roy-R61911; Liu Gang-B34182; Liu Gang-B34182
Subject: [PATCH] fsl-rio: Correct IECSR register clear value
The RETE bit in IECSR is cleared by writing a 1 to it.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <gang....@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
index b3fd081..cdd765b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#define ODSR_CLEAR 0x1c00
#define LTLEECSR_ENABLE_ALL 0xFFC000FC
#define ESCSR_CLEAR 0x07120204
+#define IECSR_CLEAR 0x80000000
#define RIO_PORT1_EDCSR 0x0640
#define RIO_PORT2_EDCSR 0x0680
@@ -1089,11 +1090,11 @@ static void port_error_handler(struct rio_mport *port,
int offset)
if (offset == 0) {
out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT1_EDCSR), 0);
- out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT1_IECSR), 0);
+ out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT1_IECSR), IECSR_CLEAR);
out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_ESCSR), ESCSR_CLEAR);
} else {
out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT2_EDCSR), 0);
- out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT2_IECSR), 0);
+ out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT2_IECSR), IECSR_CLEAR);
out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_PORT2_ESCSR), ESCSR_CLEAR);
}
}
--
1.7.3.1
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
