On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 11:26 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > If the NULL assignment is dropped, consider what happens if the > fsl_elbc_nand module is removed then reinserted. On reinsertion, it > will > see a non-NULL fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->nand, and will skip allocating a new > one. > Then you're referencing freed memory.
Oh, then this sounds like a separate bug. Removing the module should kill everything, and re-inserging the module should have zero dependencies on the previous states... Anyway, if you think the original patch is OK, I can put it to my tree. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
