On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > (Original mail lost in my email cleanup so this isn't a proper reply) > > I'll apply that for now, but I'd very much like somebody to just get rid > of the whole ppc_md.progress business. > > We have printk working early enough nowadays (and we can use udbg for > debugging). > > It was meant to display magic numbers on the panel of IBM machines, I > don't think it was every useful...
Hrm.. none of your 2 pending patches applies cleanly (factoring free_initmem & that one). Haven't had a chance to check why yet, can you check on your side ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
