On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 06:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 15:26 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:32:58 +1000
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:00 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > You can probably remove the doorbell re-check when enabling interrupts
> > > now, can't you ?
> > 
> > Ah, so that's how it currently gets away without re-raising when the
> > interrupt happens. :-)
> > 
> > I'll remove it.
> 
> Yup, I was too lazy to make a special case in the exception handlers :-)

Are you going to send a re-spin ?

Cheers,
Ben.


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to