Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > I don't think it's correct to think of a hypervisor as firmware, so I don't >> > think drivers/firmware is better. >> > >> > I'm not sure that creating virt/fsl and putting the driver in there is a >> > good >> > idea, because it will be the only driver in that directory. Unlike KVM, >> > this >> > driver is just a collection of front-ends to our hypervisor API. The >> > actual >> > hypervisor is completely separate. That's why I put it in drivers/misc, >> > because >> > it's just a single driver with a miscellaneous collection of interfaces.
> Ok, fair enough. If nobody has a strong preference any other way, just make it > drivers/firmware then. Did you mean to say drivers/misc? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
