On Thu, 19 May 2011 00:41:29 -0500 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On May 9, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > Without this, we attempt to use doorbells for IPIs, and end up > > branching to some bad address. Plus, even for the exceptions > > we don't implement, it's good to handle it and get a message out. > > > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_booke.h | 4 ++ > > arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S | 3 ++ > > arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S | 47 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > applied to next It's actually not quite right, as I misused MASKABLE_EXCEPTION and some of those ivors are critical/guest rather than normal. I'll send a followup. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
