On Wed, 04 May 2011 around 10:17:37 -0000, Kumar Gala wrote: > We should utilize nr_cpus as the max # of CPUs that we can have present > instead of NR_CPUS. This way we actually respect how nr_cpus is set on > the command line rather than ignoring it. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> > > --- > I think this is what we should be doing, but would like someone else to take > a look. > > - k > > arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >
This looks very similar to my patch at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95080/ except I also updated the comment. Also, the variable is nr_cpu_ids while the parameter is nr_cpus=, the first instance in in the changelog is referring to the variable while the second is the parameter. Sorry I took me so long get that part of my series tested and posted. milton _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
