On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:21 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > No, its the same accessors for both, since the need to distinguish them > hasn't really come up. Could you put a "if (preemptable()) return;" > guard in your implementations?
That would be a band-aid but would probably do the trick for now for !-rt, tho it wouldn't do the right thing for -rt... > Otherwise I have no objections to passing the mm in (we'll probably just > continue to ignore the arg in x86-land). Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
