On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 23:40 +0100, Henk Stegeman wrote: > What if the unmask/mask functions are dropped and only interrupt > enable/disable functions are provided?
No, that's backward. enable/disable are handled by the core, leave them there. > I.e: rename the old unmask/mask functions to enable/disable and > register them as enable/disable? I did try that, and it works too, no > spurious IRQ's and no missing IRQ's. > Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
