On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:23 -0800, Jim Keniston wrote: > FWIW, this failure isn't an obstacle for me. I'm in no way attached to > my legacy configuration; pseries_defconfig is fine for me. On the other > hand, I can continue testing fixes, and/or make my system available to > other IBMers when I'm not using it, if you want to continue to pursue > this problem. > > Thank
>From the look of it your "legacy" config is lacking the necessary storage drivers... Ben. > . > Jim > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c > > index 83f534d..5e95844 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c > > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long > > ea, > > else > > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K */ > > rc = __hash_page_4K(ea, access, vsid, ptep, trap, local, ssize, > > - subpage_protection(pgdir, ea)); > > + subpage_protection(mm, ea)); > > > > /* Dump some info in case of hash insertion failure, they should > > * never happen so it is really useful to know if/when they do > > > > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
