On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason we shouldn't set DMA_BIT_MASK(64) since the DMA block > programming model allows the address to be 64-bits? Can you explain that? The DMA registers only have room for 36 bits for the physical address. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
