On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:06:49 -0500 Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > index d361f81..19083b3 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > @@ -132,13 +132,18 @@ config PPC_E500MC > select PPC_FPU > depends on E500 > > +config PPC_E5500 > + bool > + select PPC_FPU > + select PPC_E500MC if PPC32 Currently E500MC implies E500. With this, E5500 would not imply E500 -- hence all the ifdefs with E500 || E5500 that this adds. When would we want to ifdef E500 or E500MC but not E5500? Given how similar e500mc and e5500 are, I think we should just use CONFIG_E500MC for it. Any 32/64-bit distinctions would just check CONFIG_PPC64, CONFIG_BOOK3E_64, or similar. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
