Alan Cox wrote: > Its a printk handler - better to lose the bytes than hang the box. I > think the current code is probably right.
What do you think about this change: http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-October/thread.html#76830 This is the original version of my patch. In it, I simply allow drivers to return 0 to indicate that they're too busy to accept data. It works great on the hvc driver that we have in-house today, but it might break other drivers that return 0 to indicate error. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
