On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:35 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedeki...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, sizeof(int) == 4 assumption is not good. > > > > But sizeof(int) >= 4 is perfectly fine. > > I have to disagree. I don't see how you can say that == is not okay, > but >= is okay.
If I assume that int == 4, which is true for all platform ATM, and will most probably stay true for very long time, I still make an unnecessary assumption which C99 does not guarantee. This is just not very clean. So for things which require exactly 32 bits, u32 or C99 uint32_t should be used. On the other hand, if a have a local variable "var" which needs to store values which I know will always fit 32 bits, and I do not use it in operations (I/O, etc) which require exactly 32 bits, it is better to use unsigned int for it. Unsigned int is reliably >= 4 in Linux. This is wat I meant that sizeof(int) >= 4 is perfectly fine. One everywhere, of course, but in many cases. To put it differently, if there is no special reason to limit the variable by exactly 32 bits, it is better to use int. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
