On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:19:53PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote: >> >> Then the device tree identifier, and the cpu setup functions, etc, >> should indicate >> 464, not APM821xx. >This is new SoC based on 464 cpu core. All the previous SoC device tree >CPU portion uses SoC name. > >> >> Also, why add yet another defconfig? Isn't the eval board similar to >> many others and can be supported with just a tweak of some existing >> common defconfig instead? >> >Every new board needs new defconfig. And it is not same as others. It has >Different features from other.
You make it sound as if that is a hard and fixed rule. It's not. Not all boards need a defconfig. Also, there was recent work to trim the defconfigs that exist today down so they are not so large. I suggest you do the same if you want the defconfig included. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
