In message <4c7ebaa8.7030...@us.ibm.com> you wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 12:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:47 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> >> from tip/rt/2.6.33 causes the preempt_count() to change across the cede
> >> call. This patch appears to prevents the proxy preempt_count assignment
> >> from happening. This non-local-cpu assignment to 0 would cause an
> >> underrun of preempt_count() if the local-cpu had disabled preemption
> >> prior to the assignment and then later tried to enable it. This appears
> >> to be the case with the stack of __trace_hcall* calls preceeding the
> >> return from extended_cede_processor() in the latency format trace-cmd
> >> report:
> >>
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252737: function: .cpu_die
> >
> > Note, the above 1d.... is a series of values. The first being the CPU,
> > the next if interrupts are disabled, the next if the NEED_RESCHED flag
> > is set, the next is softirqs enabled or disabled, next the
> > preempt_count, and finally the lockdepth count.
> >
> > Here we only care about the preempt_count, which is zero when '.' and a
> > number if it is something else. It is the second to last field in that
> > list.
> >
> >
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252738: function: .pseries_ma
ch_cpu_die
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252740: function: .idle_ta
sk_exit
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252741: function: .swit
ch_slb
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252742: function: .xics_te
ardown_cpu
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252743: function: .xics
_set_cpu_priority
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252744: function: .__trace_hcall
_entry
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.252745: function: .probe_hcal
l_entry
> >
> > ^
> > preempt_count set to 1
> >
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.252746: function: .__trace_hcall
_exit
> >> <idle>-0 1d..2. 201.252747: function: .probe_hcal
l_exit
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252748: function: .__trace_hcall
_entry
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.252748: function: .probe_hcal
l_entry
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.252750: function: .__trace_hcall
_exit
> >> <idle>-0 1d..2. 201.252751: function: .probe_hcal
l_exit
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.252752: function: .__trace_hcall
_entry
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.252753: function: .probe_hcal
l_entry
> > ^ ^
> > CPU preempt_count
> >
> > Entering the function probe_hcall_entry() the preempt_count is 1 (see
> > below). But probe_hcall_entry does:
> >
> > h = &get_cpu_var(hcall_stats)[opcode / 4];
> >
> > Without doing the put (which it does in probe_hcall_exit())
> >
> > So exiting the probe_hcall_entry() the prempt_count is 2.
> > The trace_hcall_entry() will do a preempt_enable() making it leave as 1.
> >
> >
> >> offon.sh-3684 6..... 201.466488: bprint: .smp_pSeries_k
ick_cpu : resetting pcnt to 0 for cpu 1
> >
> > This is CPU 6, changing the preempt count from 1 to 0.
> >
> >>
> >> preempt_count() is reset from 1 to 0 by smp_startup_cpu() without the
> >> QCSS_NOT_STOPPED check from the patch above.
> >>
> >> <idle>-0 1d.... 201.466503: function: .__trace_hcall
_exit
> >
> > Note: __trace_hcall_exit() and __trace_hcall_entry() basically do:
> >
> > preempt_disable();
> > call probe();
> > preempt_enable();
> >
> >
> >> <idle>-0 1d..1. 201.466505: function: .probe_hcal
l_exit
> >
> > The preempt_count of 1 entering the probe_hcall_exit() is because of the
> > preempt_disable() shown above. It should have been entered as a 2.
> >
> > But then it does:
> >
> >
> > put_cpu_var(hcall_stats);
> >
> > making preempt_count 0.
> >
> > But the preempt_enable() in the trace_hcall_exit() causes this to be -1.
> >
> >
> >> <idle>-0 1d.Hff. 201.466507: bprint: .pseries_mach
_cpu_die : after cede: ffffffff
> >>
> >> With the preempt_count() being one less than it should be, the final
> >> preempt_enable() in the trace_hcall path drops preempt_count to
> >> 0xffffffff, which of course is an illegal value and leads to a crash.
> >
> > I'm confused to how this works in mainline?
>
> Turns out it didn't. 2.6.33.5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y sees this exact same
> behavior. The following, part of the 2.6.33.6 stable release, prevents
> this from happening:
>
> aef40e87d866355ffd279ab21021de733242d0d5
> powerpc/pseries: Only call start-cpu when a CPU is stopped
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ static inline int __devinit smp_startup_cpu(unsigned
> int lcpu)
>
> pcpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(lcpu);
>
> + /* Check to see if the CPU out of FW already for kexec */
> + if (smp_query_cpu_stopped(pcpu) == QCSS_NOT_STOPPED){
> + cpu_set(lcpu, of_spin_map);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> /* Fixup atomic count: it exited inside IRQ handler. */
> task_thread_info(paca[lcpu].__current)->preempt_count = 0;
>
> The question is now, Is this the right fix? If so, perhaps we can update
> the comment to be a bit more clear and not refer solely to kexec.
>
> Michael Neuling, can you offer any thoughts here? We hit this EVERY
> TIME, which makes me wonder if the offline/online path could do this
> without calling smp_startup_cpu at all.
We need to call smp_startup_cpu on boot when we the cpus are still in
FW. smp_startup_cpu does this for us on boot.
I'm wondering if we just need to move the test down a bit to make sure
the preempt_count is set. I've not been following this thread, but
maybe this might work?
Untested patch below...
Mikey
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
index 0317cce..3afaba4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
@@ -104,18 +104,18 @@ static inline int __devinit smp_startup_cpu(unsigned int
lcpu)
pcpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(lcpu);
- /* Check to see if the CPU out of FW already for kexec */
- if (smp_query_cpu_stopped(pcpu) == QCSS_NOT_STOPPED){
- cpumask_set_cpu(lcpu, of_spin_mask);
- return 1;
- }
-
/* Fixup atomic count: it exited inside IRQ handler. */
task_thread_info(paca[lcpu].__current)->preempt_count = 0;
if (get_cpu_current_state(lcpu) == CPU_STATE_INACTIVE)
goto out;
+ /* Check to see if the CPU out of FW already for kexec */
+ if (smp_query_cpu_stopped(pcpu) == QCSS_NOT_STOPPED){
+ cpumask_set_cpu(lcpu, of_spin_mask);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
/*
* If the RTAS start-cpu token does not exist then presume the
* cpu is already spinning.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
