On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:43, Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > In the interest of making driver code easier to write and review, > would you be opposed to a set of patches to remove the ERR_PTR() > pattern from phylib and its users? Not at all. I was trying to make sure all the information was available, and I'm not really a big fan of passing in a **ptr to get set. But I don't really have a strong opinion. This is just the design i settled on. Heck, 99.9% of the errors are unlikely to ever happen, a they're caused by hardware malfunction! Andy > > g. > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. >
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
