Micha Nelissen wrote: > Can you explain what the difference what you mean with relied on > proprietary vs standard? E.g. setting the port-write destination ID > register is standardized? And the format of the port-write message > itself is also.
The original description should use "error-stopped state recovery" term instead of simple "error recovery". And standard based handling of error-stopped states was added. I mentioned tsi57x in that context because it uses proprietary mechanism to generate "magic" control symbol to clear error-stopped states. Other switches do not have similar function and have to rely on standard implementation. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev