Micha Nelissen wrote:
 
> Can you explain what the difference what you mean with relied on
> proprietary vs standard? E.g. setting the port-write destination ID
> register is standardized? And the format of the port-write message
> itself is also.

The original description should use "error-stopped state recovery" term
instead of simple "error recovery".
And standard based handling of error-stopped states was added. I
mentioned tsi57x in that context because it uses proprietary mechanism
to generate "magic" control symbol to clear error-stopped states. Other
switches do not have similar function and have to rely on standard
implementation.
  
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to