On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:53:15PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> I'm sick of seeing ppc64_runlatch_off in our profiles, so inline the
> heavily used part of it into the callers. To avoid a mess of circular includes
> I didn't add it as an inline function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
> ---
>
> Index: powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> ===================================================================
> --- powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h 2010-08-04
> 19:55:38.910793475 +1000
> +++ powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h 2010-08-04
> 20:20:19.490751850 +1000
> @@ -951,7 +951,14 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>
> extern void ppc64_runlatch_on(void);
> -extern void ppc64_runlatch_off(void);
> +extern void __ppc64_runlatch_off(void);
> +
> +#define ppc64_runlatch_off() \
> + do { \
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_CTRL) && \
> + test_thread_flag(TIF_RUNLATCH)) \
> + __ppc64_runlatch_off(); \
> + } while (0);
No semicolon here.
-Olof
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
